2 Zealous Moms, 2 Education Travesties

Womens Nine West Swimsuits, Clothing | Kohl's
Enjoy free shipping and easy returns every day at Kohl's. Find great deals on Womens Nine West Swimsuits at Kohl's today!

Stonebriar Collection Wedding Wish Jar
Capture wonderful memories and bits of advice from family and friends with this Stonebriar Collection wedding wish jar.

A frustrated Ohio mom and a religious New Hampshire mother have discovered that educating kids is not as easy as it may seem.

Kelley Williams-Bolar was sent to jail by a judge because she wanted her kids to get a decent education and Brenda Voydatch's child was sent to public school by a judge because she wanted to instill her faith in her daughter and home-teach her.

Aspiring teacher and current teacher aide Williams-Bolar was fed up with the atrocity which passes for public education in America and she did something about it: She cheated, lied and was caught.

Four years ago, frustrated with the poor education her daughters were receiving in her Akron neighborhood schools and fearful for their safety in her crime-plagued area after their home was burglarized, Williams-Bolar tried to scam the system. With the acknowledged complicity of her father, she enrolled the girls in the nearby, highly-regarded Copley-Fairlawn School District.

The district hired a private investigator to look into her actual residence and determined that Williams-Bolar's kids lived in Akron. After refusing to compensate Copley-Fairlawn by paying $ 30,000. in retroactive tuition, their mother was accused of falsifying records and filing false court papers and jailed for 10 days.

Few would fault Williams-Bolar for her motivations, protecting and educating her daughters. As she said, "It's overwhelming. I'm exhausted. I did this for them, so there it is. I did this for them." As Copley-Fairlawn officials said, she was cheating because her daughters received a quality education without paying taxes to fund it: "Those dollars need to stay home with our students."

There's a larger issue in all this, and that issue does not involve discrimination against Williams-Bolar and her daughters because they are black. Without specifically alleging bias, that implication was made by Williams-Bolar who claims she was "singled out," a claim reinforced by a supporter and by empathetic ABC News commentators.

In point of fact, some hundred other students were investigated and found to stay in other districts. Three families agreed to pay tuition to Copley-Fairlawn, others withdrew their kids, Williams-Bolar willing back and went to jail because of it.

The larger issue is the sorry state of Akron schools as well as many other inner-city schools which are so atrocious that parents resort to subterfuges and illegalities in order to get their children safely educated.

Brenda Voydatch is associated with an entirely different, combined educational-judicial travesty. She did not want another school for eleven year old Amanda. She wanted to insure her daughter not only received an education but that it was a faith-based, Christian education which Amanda would never get in the public school system and which she could provide at home.

Voydatch did not specifically say she wanted to save Amanda from the pagan atmosphere and influences as well as the amoral political correctness that pervade public schools in America today. She simply asserted, "I believe it's a parent's fundamental right to teach a child the beliefs within their home. Her once husband disagreed and after Voydatch had taught Amanda at home for three years he was able to get a judge to order the child into public school.

Her attorney called that order, that sentence, "a clear constitutional violation" based on the judge's judgment that Amanda "reflected her mother's rigidity in matters of Faith, and that because of that rigidity she needed to be ordered into government run schools."

The unspecified judge in the Fox News account thebyy not only took to himself or herself the right and authority to overrule a mother's desires but presided to determine that her "rigidity in matters of Faith," without defining "rigidity," disqualified her from teaching and inculcating the tenets of her faith in her own child.

That judge has taken judicial activism and presumption to a whole new level, a level at which a jurist asserts dictatorial powers in a nation which, so far, still agreements the freedom to worship as one pleases as outlined in the First Amendment. Brenda and Amanda Voydatch are being denied that most fundamental American right.

The matter has now appeared to the New Hampshire Supreme Court and is admittedly muddled by the complication of Amanda's father. His attorney contends this is a marital, not a religious case: "It's not really about religion." He says the two parents disagree about what's best for Amanda, adding, "One wants the child very isolated and cloistered and the other wants the child to be worldly and be exposed to all the experiences oneought to have as an adolescent."

In sum, the mother wants their child taught basic moral principles, the father wishes Amanda to attend public school with all its attendant "experiences" of sexual promiscuity, illicit drug use, and, again, that PC philosophy.

What total travesties!